Atypical line movement
Movements outside the historical envelope of the market and sport.
Service · Sports integrity
Sports integrity monitoring
We observe sports activity by event and by market, combining operational, behavioral, and betting signals to separate noise from actionable alerts.
Why it matters
Most alerts in sports integrity are noise, and noise consumes the time that should go to real cases. Leagues, regulators, and operators need a consistent filter.
We combine signals from multiple sources with sport-calibrated heuristics to surface what deserves investigation and leave the rest explained.
What's included
- Ingestion of odds, volume, and result feeds
- Sport-calibrated signal archetypes
- Historical profile per event, team, and athlete
- Triage flow with acknowledgment and escalation
- Standardized reports for leagues and regulators
- Collaborative workspace with per-case timeline
- Signed evidence with hash and timestamp
- Integration API for internal systems
Signal archetypes
Volume concentrated in a short window
Abnormal buildup in the minutes before the event in low-liquidity markets.
Coordinated betting pattern
Cluster of accounts with identical behavior across operators.
Result outside the model
Outcome far beyond the sport model's confidence interval.
In-play anomaly
Micro-events that break the game's statistical continuity.
Actor recurrence
Repetition of profiles across distinct events over time.
How we implement
Per-sport calibration
We define baseline, envelope, and thresholds specific to each sport and league.
Source wiring
We integrate operators, odds providers, and official league data.
Triage model
We configure the L1/L2 flow with agreed response times.
Supervised pilot
We run 2–4 competitions with a joint review of every alert.
Stable operation
We transfer to continuous operation with quarterly calibration reviews.
Evidence package
Detailed methodology, per-sport calibration, and samples of reports delivered to leagues and regulators.
Questions
Frequently asked
How is sports-integrity monitoring different from sportsbook fraud detection?
Sportsbook fraud detection optimises operator P&L; sports-integrity monitoring protects competition integrity. Our scope is per-event and per-market with operational, behavioural, and betting signals, and reports addressed to the league or regulator, not the operator's risk desk.How do you reduce false positives across different sports?
Each sport has its own calibration: baselines, envelopes, and thresholds tuned per league with historical data. Pilots run 2-4 competitions of joint review before stable operation; clients have observed 60-70% false-positive reductions after calibration.Can the evidence be used in regulatory proceedings?
Yes. Reports include signed hashes, timestamps, source provenance, and per-case timeline; they have been accepted in EU and LATAM proceedings under standardised league and regulator templates.
Related cases
CASE · 01
Professional league · LATAM
Outcome
71% drop in false positives after per-sport calibration.
CASE · 02
Regulator · EU
Outcome
Standardized evidence flow accepted across three jurisdictions.
Ready to review the evidence?
Send scope and jurisdictions and we'll return in 48 hours with the applicable package.